The title retains the document edition where identified. Research check dates are not publication dates. Consult the PDF for printed revision and process conditions.
Brand explicitly excludes motion-picture film. Independent lab identity discussion points toward Kodak/Ultramax but supplies no exact coating crosswalk. Vivid is not Vintage Tone or HARMAN Phoenix.
400-specific official video rules out remjet removal and compares it to Aurora 800. Earlier CEO nondisclosure interview is specifically about 800; it cannot establish 400 as Ultramax.
Still needed: Obtain a brand-issued exact product/coating crosswalk or inspect a documented, dated retail roll and base-stock control.
A solid connection establishes the stated relationship, such as a respool or family variant. It does not establish unchanged resolution, processing or coating generation. Dashed connections retain the identity uncertainty.
Results below use a 36 × 24 mm image area and ideal two-sample spatial sampling. Approximate graph readings retain their source process; a color-layer envelope is not an uncertainty interval.
No product-specific spatial-resolution input is established here. ISO, visible grain and sensitometric curves cannot fill this gap.
Manufacturer technical data, independent of the video's scanning workflow.
Historical editions, coating revisions, development and retail batches retain their own scope. Research supplements do not change the main color-film catalog.